forty centuries of ink-µÚ44²¿·Ö
°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡
that¡¡Judge¡¡Ransom¡¡rendered¡¡the¡¡opinion¡¡and¡¡made
the¡¡order¡¡for¡¡its¡¡chemical¡¡examination¡¡which¡¡is¡¡cited
in¡¡full£º
Estate¡¡of¡¡Thomas¡¡J¡£¡¡Monroe¡£¡¨This¡¡is¡¡an¡¡application
by¡¡the¡¡special¡¡guardian¡¡and¡¡contestant¡¡in
this¡¡proceeding£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡now¡¡pending¡¡before¡¡the
assistant£»¡¡for¡¡leave¡¡to¡¡photograph¡¡the¡¡various
papers¡¡which¡¡have¡¡been¡¡filed¡¡as¡¡the¡¡will¡¡of¡¡the
deceased£»¡¡and¡¡to¡¡compel¡¡the¡¡filing¡¡of¡¡two¡¡parts¡¡of
one¡¡of¡¡said¡¡wills£»¡¡which¡¡was¡¡executed¡¡in¡¡triplicate£»
likewise¡¡that¡¡the¡¡last¡¡paper¡¡be¡¡subjected¡¡to¡¡chemical
tests¡¡for¡¡the¡¡purpose¡¡of¡¡disclosing¡¡the¡¡nature¡¡of
the¡¡composition¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ink¡¡and¡¡the¡¡process¡¡or
processes¡¡to¡¡which¡¡it¡¡has¡¡been¡¡subjected¡£
¡¨Upon¡¡the¡¡oral¡¡argument¡¡the¡¡surrogate¡¡decided
the¡¡applications¡¡first¡¡stated¡¡in¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡the¡¡petitioner£»
reserving¡¡only¡¡the¡¡question¡¡of¡¡his¡¡power¡¡to
direct¡¡or¡¡permit¡¡the¡¡chemical¡¡tests¡£¡¡The¡¡special
guardian¡¡on¡¡the¡¡oral¡¡argument¡¡stated¡¡that¡¡he¡¡was
unable£»¡¡to¡¡find¡¡any¡¡authority¡¡for¡¡the¡¡application¡£
¡¨Consultation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡various¡¡sources¡¡of¡¡authority
upon¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡of¡¡expert¡¡testimony¡¡and¡¡the
various¡¡tests¡¡for¡¡the¡¡purpose¡¡of¡¡establishing¡¡or¡¡disproving
handwriting¡¡has¡¡not¡¡resulted¡¡in¡¡the¡¡discovery
of¡¡any¡¡authority¡¡for¡¡granting¡¡the¡¡application¡£
It¡¡is¡¡apparent£»¡¡however£»¡¡from¡¡some¡¡of¡¡the¡¡cases
that¡¡such¡¡an¡¡examination¡¡must¡¡have¡¡been¡¡permitted£»
for¡¡instance£»¡¡in¡¡Fulton¡¡v¡£¡¡Hood¡¡£¨34th
Penn¡£¡¡State¡¡Reports£»¡¡365£©£»¡¡expert¡¡testimony¡¡was
received¡¡in¡¡corroboration¡¡of¡¡positive¡¡evidence¡¡to
prove¡¡that¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡of¡¡an¡¡instrument¡¡was¡¡written
by¡¡the¡¡same¡¡hand£»¡¡with¡¡the¡¡same¡¡ink£»¡¡and¡¡at¡¡the
same¡¡time¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡inconceivable¡¡how¡¡testimony¡¡of
any¡¡value¡¡could¡¡be¡¡given¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡character¡¡of
ink¡¡with¡¡which¡¡an¡¡instrument¡¡was¡¡written£»¡¡unless
it¡¡had¡¡been¡¡subjected¡¡to¡¡a¡¡chemical¡¡test¡£¡¡The
writer¡¡of¡¡a¡¡valuable¡¡article¡¡in¡¡the¡¡eighteenth¡¡volume
of¡¡the¡¡American¡¡Law¡¡Register£»¡¡page¡¡281¡¡£¨R¡£¡¡U¡£
Piper£»¡¡an¡¡eminent¡¡expert¡¡of¡¡Chicago£»¡¡Ill¡££©£»¡¡in
commenting¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡rule¡¡as¡¡stated¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of
Fulton¡¡v¡£¡¡Hood¡¡£¨supra£©£»¡¡very¡¡properly¡¡says£º
¡¨¡¡'Microscopical¡¡and¡¡chemical¡¡tests¡¡may¡¡be¡¡competent
to¡¡settle¡¡the¡¡question£»¡¡but¡¡these¡¡should¡¡not
be¡¡received¡¡as¡¡evidence£»¡¡I¡¡think£»¡¡unless¡¡the¡¡expert
is¡¡able¡¡to¡¡show¡¡to¡¡the¡¡court¡¡and¡¡the¡¡jury¡¡the¡¡actual
results¡¡of¡¡his¡¡examination£»¡¡and¡¡also¡¡to¡¡explain¡¡his
methods£»¡¡so¡¡that¡¡they¡¡can¡¡be¡¡fully¡¡understood¡£'
¡¨The¡¡writer¡¡of¡¡this¡¡article¡¡is¡¡also¡¡authority¡¡for
the¡¡statement¡¡that¡¡in¡¡the¡¡French¡¡Courts¡¡every
manipulation¡¡or¡¡experiment¡¡necessary¡¡to¡¡elucidate
the¡¡truth¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case£»¡¡even¡¡to¡¡the¡¡destruction¡¡of¡¡the
document¡¡in¡¡question£»¡¡is¡¡allowed£»¡¡the¡¡Court£»¡¡as¡¡a
matter¡¡of¡¡precaution£»¡¡being¡¡first¡¡supplied¡¡with¡¡a
certified¡¡copy¡¡of¡¡the¡¡same¡£
¡¨The¡¡most¡¡obvious¡¡argument¡¡to¡¡be¡¡urged¡¡against
allowing¡¡a¡¡chemical¡¡test¡¡to¡¡be¡¡made¡¡on¡¡a¡¡will£»¡¡and
one¡¡that¡¡was¡¡suggested¡¡by¡¡the¡¡court¡¡on¡¡the¡¡argument
of¡¡this¡¡motion£»¡¡is¡¡that£»¡¡inasmuch¡¡as¡¡the¡¡paper
may¡¡be¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡of¡¡future¡¡controversy¡¡in¡¡this¡¡or
some¡¡other¡¡tribunal£»¡¡future¡¡litigants¡¡should¡¡not¡¡be
prejudiced¡¡by¡¡any¡¡alteration¡¡or¡¡manipulation¡¡of¡¡the
instrument¡£¡¡I¡¡do¡¡not¡¡think£»¡¡however£»¡¡that¡¡this
objection¡¡is¡¡sound¡£¡¡Take¡¡an¡¡extreme¡¡case£»¡¡of¡¡permitting
a¡¡sufficient¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ink¡¡£¨which¡¡the
affidavit¡¡of¡¡the¡¡expert¡¡shows¡¡to¡¡be¡¡but¡¡infinitesimal£©
for¡¡the¡¡purpose¡¡of¡¡chemical¡¡examination£»
the¡¡form¡¡of¡¡the¡¡letter¡¡would¡¡remain¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡paper£»
if¡¡not£»¡¡the¡¡form¡¡and¡¡appearance¡¡of¡¡the¡¡entire¡¡signature
might£»¡¡as¡¡a¡¡preliminary¡¡precaution£»¡¡be¡¡preserved
by¡¡photography¡£¡¡The¡¡portion¡¡of¡¡the¡¡signature
remaining¡¡would¡¡afford¡¡ample¡¡material¡¡for
future¡¡experiments¡¡and¡¡investigations¡¡in¡¡subsequent
proceedings¡¡wherein¡¡it¡¡might¡¡be¡¡deemed¡¡advisable
to¡¡take¡¡that¡¡course¡£
¡¨Because¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡matter¡¡of¡¡the¡¡controversy
may¡¡be¡¡litigated¡¡hereafter¡¡should¡¡not¡¡deprive¡¡parties
in¡¡the¡¡proceeding¡¡of¡¡any¡¡rights¡¡which¡¡they
would¡¡otherwise¡¡have¡£¡¡They¡¡certainly¡¡are¡¡entitled
to¡¡all¡¡rights¡¡in¡¡this¡¡proceeding¡¡that¡¡the¡¡parties¡¡to
any¡¡future¡¡proceedings¡¡would¡¡have¡£¡¡Besides£»¡¡all
the¡¡parties¡¡whose¡¡presence¡¡would¡¡be¡¡necessary¡¡to
an¡¡adjudication¡¡in£»¡¡for¡¡example£»¡¡an¡¡ejectment¡¡proceeding£»
are¡¡£¨or¡¡their¡¡privies¡¡are£©¡¡parties¡¡here¡£¡¡It
certainly¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡that¡¡the¡¡law£»¡¡seeking¡¡the¡¡truth£»
will¡¡not¡¡avail¡¡itself¡¡of¡¡this¡¡scientific¡¡method¡¡of
ascertaining¡¡the¡¡genuineness¡¡of¡¡the¡¡instrument¡¡because
of¡¡some¡¡problematical¡¡effect¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡rights
or¡¡opportunities¡¡of¡¡parties¡¡to¡¡future¡¡litigations
respecting¡¡the¡¡same¡¡instrument¡£¡¡The¡¡possibilities¡¡of
litigation¡¡over¡¡a¡¡will¡¡are¡¡almost¡¡infinite£»¡¡and¡¡if¡¡such
a¡¡rule¡¡should¡¡obtain¡¡this¡¡important¡¡channel¡¡of
investigation¡¡would¡¡be¡¡closed¡£¡¡Suppose¡¡the¡¡same
objection¡¡were¡¡raised¡¡to¡¡the¡¡first¡¡action¡¡of¡¡ejectment
which¡¡might¡¡be¡¡brought£»¡¡it¡¡might¡¡then¡¡with
the¡¡same¡¡force¡¡be¡¡urged¡¡that¡¡parties¡¡to¡¡some¡¡future
ejectment¡¡suit¡¡would¡¡be¡¡prejudiced¡¡by¡¡a¡¡chemical
test¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ink¡¡used¡¡in¡¡the¡¡will£»¡¡and¡¡so¡¡on¡¡ad¡¡infinitum¡£
¡¨By¡¡not¡¡availing¡¡itself¡¡of¡¡this¡¡method¡¡of¡¡ascertaining
the¡¡truth¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡character¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ink£»¡¡the
Court¡¡deprives¡¡itself¡¡of¡¡a¡¡species¡¡of¡¡evidence¡¡which
amounts¡¡to¡¡practical¡¡demonstration¡£
¡¨I¡¡can¡¡see¡¡no¡¡reason¡¡why¡¡the¡¡application¡¡should
not¡¡be¡¡granted¡£¡¨
The¡¡order¡¡in¡¡part¡¡reads£º
¡¨It¡¡is¡¡ordered¡¡and¡¡directed¡¡that¡¡Charles¡¡H¡£
Beckett£»¡¡the¡¡special¡¡guardian¡¡aforesaid£»¡¡be¡¡and¡¡he
hereby¡¡is¡¡allowed¡¡permission¡¡to¡¡photograph¡¡the
aforesaid¡¡paper¡¡writings¡¡described¡¡in¡¡said¡¡order¡¡to
show¡¡cause£»¡¡viz¡££»¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡two¡¡parts¡¡of¡¡a¡¡triplicate
Will¡¡of¡¡Thomas¡¡J¡£¡¡Monroe£»¡¡deceased£»¡¡dated
February¡¡10th£»¡¡1873£»¡¡which¡¡were¡¡filed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡office
of¡¡the¡¡Surrogate¡¡of¡¡the¡¡City¡¡and¡¡County¡¡of¡¡New
York¡¡on¡¡or¡¡about¡¡the¡¡9th¡¡day¡¡of¡¡May£»¡¡1889£»¡¡and
also¡¡the¡¡contested¡¡Will¡¡herein¡¡dated¡¡March¡¡27th
and¡¡June¡¡1st£»¡¡1888£»¡¡and¡¡to¡¡have¡¡the¡¡said¡¡paper
writing£»¡¡bearing¡¡date¡¡March¡¡22d¡¡and¡¡June¡¡1st£»
1888£»¡¡subjected¡¡to¡¡such¡¡chemical¡¡test¡¡or¡¡tests¡¡as
shall¡¡disclose¡¡the¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡the¡¡composition¡¡of¡¡the
ink¡¡and£»¡¡if¡¡possible£»¡¡the¡¡process¡¡or¡¡processes¡¡to
which¡¡it¡¡has¡¡been¡¡subjected£»¡¡if¡¡any¡£
¡¨And¡¡it¡¡is¡¡further¡¡ordered¡¡and¡¡directed¡¡that
such¡¡chemical¡¡test¡¡be¡¡applied¡¡to¡¡the¡¡ink¡¡or¡¡writing
fluid¡¡on¡¡said¡¡alleged¡¡Will¡¡to¡¡the¡¡following¡¡specified
portion£»¡¡or¡¡any¡¡part¡¡of¡¡such¡¡portions£»¡¡viz¡£¡¨
Specifications¡¡in¡¡minute¡¡detail¡¡follow£»¡¡calling¡¡attention
to¡¡the¡¡words¡¡and¡¡spaces¡¡which¡¡are¡¡permitted¡¡to
be¡¡chemically¡¡tested£»¡¡and¡¡then¡¡continues£º
¡¨And¡¡it¡¡is¡¡further¡¡ordered¡¡and¡¡directed¡¡that¡¡the
said¡¡paper¡¡writings¡¡shall¡¡be¡¡photographed¡¡before
any¡¡chemical¡¡tests¡¡are¡¡applied¡¡thereto¡£
¡¨And¡¡it¡¡is¡¡further¡¡ordered¡¡and¡¡directed¡¡that
such¡¡photographing¡¡and¡¡chemical¡¡tests¡¡be¡¡performed
by¡¡David¡¡N¡£¡¡Carvalho£»¡¡Esq¡££»¡¡a¡¡proper¡¡and
suitable¡¡person£»¡¡at¡¡the¡¡places¡¡above¡¡indicated
respectively£»¡¡between¡¡the¡¡10th¡¡and¡¡the¡¡20th¡¡days¡¡of
June£»¡¡1889£»¡¡inclusive£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡presence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡parties
in¡¡interest¡¡or¡¡their¡¡attorneys£»¡¡upon¡¡at¡¡least¡¡two
days'¡¡notice¡¡to¡¡all¡¡parties¡¡herein¡¡or¡¡their¡¡attorneys¡£
¡¨And¡¡it¡¡is¡¡further¡¡ordered¡¡and¡¡directed¡¡that¡¡in
the¡¡event¡¡of¡¡destruction¡¡or¡¡breaking¡¡of¡¡the¡¡negatives
after¡¡such¡¡paper¡¡writings¡¡have¡¡been¡¡photographed£»
the¡¡said¡¡special¡¡guardian£»¡¡upon¡¡similar
notice£»¡¡shall¡¡have¡¡leave¡¡to¡¡re¡photograph¡¡the¡¡said
paper¡¡writings£»¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡place¡¡and¡¡by¡¡the¡¡said
David¡¡N¡£¡¡Carvalho£»¡¡between¡¡the¡¡10th¡¡and¡¡20th
days¡¡of¡¡June£»¡¡1889£»¡¡inclusive¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨£¨Signed£©¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡RASTUS¡¡S¡£¡¡RANSOM£»
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Surrogate¡£¡¨
On¡¡the¡¡19th¡¡of¡¡June£»¡¡1889£»¡¡pursuant¡¡to¡¡the¡¡order¡¡of
the¡¡court£»¡¡the¡¡alleged¡¡will¡¡referred¡¡to¡¡was¡¡first¡¡photographed£»
and¡¡later¡¡in¡¡that¡¡day¡¡such¡¡places¡¡as¡¡had
been¡¡designated¡¡in¡¡the¡¡order¡¡were¡¡chemically¡¡treated£»
as¡¡part¡¡of¡¡a¡¡series¡¡of¡¡experiments¡£¡¡The¡¡results¡¡obtained
briefly¡¡summarized¡¡were¡¡as£»¡¡follows£º¡¡The¡¡instrument
which¡¡purported¡¡to¡¡be¡¡a¡¡holographic¡¡will¡¡of
Thomas¡¡J¡£¡¡Monroe¡¡the¡¡experiments¡¡showed¡¡conclusively
to¡¡be¡¡not¡¡the¡¡case£»¡¡as¡¡neither¡¡pen¡¡nor¡¡ink¡¡in
the¡¡body¡¡writing¡¡portion¡¡or¡¡in¡¡the¡¡decedent's¡¡signature
had¡¡ever¡¡touched¡¡the¡¡paper£»¡¡the¡¡date¡¡and¡¡names
of¡¡the¡¡witnesses¡¡thereon¡¡were¡¡written£»¡¡however£»¡¡with
pen¡¡and¡¡ink¡£¡¡Furthermore£»¡¡the¡¡experiments¡¡demonstrated
beyond¡¡question¡¡that¡¡exclusive¡¡of¡¡its¡¡date¡¡and
names¡¡of¡¡witnesses£»¡¡that¡¡it¡¡was¡¡what¡¡is¡¡commonly
known¡¡as¡¡a¡¡transfer¡¡taken¡¡from¡¡a¡¡gelatine¡¡pad¡¡£¨hektograph£©£»
a¡¡method¡¡of¡¡duplicating¡¡popularly¡¡in¡¡vogue
at¡¡that¡¡time¡£¡¡The¡¡deduced¡¡facts¡¡in¡¡the¡¡matter¡¡being
that¡¡Thomas¡¡J¡£¡¡Monroe¡¡had¡¡written¡¡his¡¡will¡¡in¡¡an
aniline¡¡purple¡¡ink£»¡¡to¡¡which¡¡he¡¡had¡¡appended¡¡his¡¡name£»
leaving¡¡blank¡¡spaces¡¡to¡¡be¡¡filled¡¡in¡¡for¡¡the¡¡date£»¡¡names
of¡¡witnesses£»¡¡etc¡££»¡¡and¡¡had¡¡transferred¡¡the¡¡same¡¡to¡¡a
hektograph£»¡¡from¡¡which¡¡he¡¡had¡¡taken¡¡a¡¡number¡¡of
duplicate¡¡facsimile¡¡copies£»¡¡and¡¡at¡¡some¡¡other¡¡time¡¡had
filled¡¡in¡¡the¡¡blank¡¡spaces¡¡by¡¡ordinary¡¡methods¡¡and¡¡to
which£»¡¡at¡¡his¡¡request£»¡¡the¡¡names¡¡of¡¡the¡¡witnesses¡¡had
been¡¡written¡¡with¡¡a¡¡pen¡¡and¡¡ink¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡trial¡¡which
followed¡¡the¡¡surrogate¡¡declined¡¡to¡¡sustain¡¡the¡¡allegation
of¡¡the¡¡proponents¡¡that¡¡the¡¡alleged¡¡signature¡¡was
the¡¡original¡¡writing¡¡of¡¡Thomas¡¡J¡£¡¡Monroe£»¡¡or¡¡indeed
of¡¡any¡¡person¡£¡¡The¡¡will¡¡was¡¡not¡¡admitt